Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Medicare&medicaid Gu 34,999desoto General Hospital, et al., Plaintiffs-appellees, v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health & Human Services,et al., Defendants-appellants
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. - 776 F.2d 115
Nov. 7, 1985
Stanford O. Bardwell, U.S. Atty., Joseph G. Simmons, Asst. U.S. Atty., Baton Rouge, La., Barbara C. Biddle, Anthony J. Steinmeyer, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Jeanne Schulte Scott, Arlington, Va., for defendants-appellants.
Ronald L. Roland, Ricardo M. Guevara, Baton Rouge, La., Powers, Pyles, Sutter & O'Hare, Ronald N. Sutter, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellees.
Joseph E. Casson, Thomas H. Brock, Beverly P. Jennison, Washington, D.C., for amicus-Brentwood Hosp.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana; Frank J. Polozola, District Judge, Presiding.
Before GARZA, POLITZ, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
DeSoto General Hospital and the other plaintiffs-appellees seek a rehearing, with a suggestion for rehearing en banc, of our modification on rehearing, 766 F.2d 186 (5th Cir.1985) of our original opinion, 766 F.2d 182 (5th Cir.1985). Appellees contend that we erred by modifying on rehearing the remedy ordered in the original opinion. We find the argument of appellees persuasive. Accordingly, we grant panel rehearing, vacate the opinion on rehearing, and reinstate the original opinion in full. This grant of panel rehearing moots the suggestion for rehearing en banc.
REHEARING GRANTED, OPINION ON REHEARING VACATED, ORIGINAL OPINION REINSTATED.