Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Glen Walker and Benford Walker, Next Friend of Florencewalker, Deceased and Estate of Florence Walker, Appellants, v. State of Iowa, Judicial Department of State of Iowa,including Supreme Court, Court of Appeals and Polk Countydistrict Court; W.w. Reynoldson, Chief Justice; Thomas J.miller, Attorney General; Valley National Bank and Trustco., Administrator of the Estate of Florence Walker and Itsattorney, Bernard O'malley, Appellees
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. - 780 F.2d 720
Submitted Nov. 4, 1985.Decided Jan. 7, 1986
Walker, et al., pro se.
Bernard O'Malley, Des Moines, Iowa, for Valley Nat. Bank.
Brent Appel, Asst. Atty. Gen., for State of Iowa.
Before HEANEY, BOWMAN, and WOLLMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Glen and Benford Walker appeal pro se from the district court's dismissal of their civil rights suit for failure to state a claim. They allege that they and their deceased mother, Florence Walker, were deprived of due process of law in state court proceedings concerning the conservatorship of Florence Walker and probate of her will. They also contend that the twenty-first amendment to the Iowa Constitution violates the Federal Constitution because it denies them the right to vote for state judges.
We have carefully reviewed the record and we find appellant's arguments frivolous and without merit. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. See 8th Cir.R. 12(a).