Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Unpublished Dispositionulysses January, Willie Salter and James K. Bell,plaintiffs-appellants, v. Stolaruk Corporation, Defendant-appellee
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. - 785 F.2d 308
1/10/86
BEFORE: MERRITT, JONES and WELLFORD, Circuit Judges.
The plaintiffs' appeal from the district court's order denying class certification in this employment discrimination case. This appeal has been referred to a panel of the Court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit, for consideration of a jurisdictional defect.
It is well established that an order refusing class certification is not a final order and does not come within the exceptions to the final order rule. Coopers and Lybrand v. Livesay, 437 U.S. 463, 467 (1978). Therefore, it is clear that the plaintiffs have appealed from a nonappealable order.
The defendant moves for punitive damages and double costs under Rule 34, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, because the appeal is frivolous. We decline to award punitive damages or double costs, but we will award the defendant costs on appeal. Plaintiffs' request for attorney fees for responding to defendant's motion is also denied.
The appeal is sua sponte dismissed for lack of jurisdiction under Rule 9(d)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. The motion for punitive damages and double costs is denied. The defendant is awarded costs on appeal.