Case Resources
Search this Case
in
Google Scholar
on the Web
Google
Web Search
MSN
Web Search
Yahoo!
Web Search
in the News
Google
News Search
Google
News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google
Blog Search
Technorati
Blog Search
in other Databases
Google
Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Ghazi H. Qaisi and Abdul M. Qaisi, Defendants-appellants
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. - 786 F.2d 242
March 27, 1986
Before MARTIN and WELLFORD, Circuit Judges and WEICK, Senior Circuit judge.
Prior Opinion: 6 Cir., 779 F.2d 346.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition for rehearing filed herein by the plaintiff-appellee, the Court concludes that the issues raised were fully considered upon the original submission and decision of this case.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the petition for rehearing be and it hereby is denied.
WELLFORD, Circuit Judge, concurring.
I concur in the denial of the petition but set forth briefly my reasons.
Unfortunately, in this case the government proved an attempt to suborn false testimony of Barbara Qaisi. She was wrongfully induced and bribed to give untrue testimony but that testimony was not material at the proceeding since the marriage of Barbara and Abdul Qaisi was, at the outset, legal on its face, and it was immaterial as to whether they were still living together at the time of the hearing. Materiality is an essential element of a perjury charge. See United States v. Brumley, 560 F.2d 1268, 1274 (5th Cir.1977); United States v. Damato, 554 F.2d 1371 (5th Cir.1977); United States v. Slavik, 548 F.2d 75 (3d Cir.1977). The argument made by the government in the petition to rehear has some merit; regrettably, it was not presented adequately by brief and at oral argument. I therefore with some reluctance join in the denial of the petition for rehearing.