Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Bertold J. Pembaur, M.d., Plaintiff-appellant, v. City of Cincinnati; Hamilton County; Hon. Norman Murdock,county Commissioner; Hon. Robert A. Taft, Ii,county Commissioner; William P. Whaler,jr.; and Russell L. Jackson,defendants-appellees
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. - 792 F.2d 57
May 29, 1986
Before KENNEDY and JONES, Circuit Judges; and COHN, District Judge.*ORDER
This case was originally before this court on plaintiff's appeal of a district court order dismissing his civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. We affirmed the district court order as to the dismissal of defendant Hamilton County. We had reasoned that one single, discrete decision by County officials was insufficient to establish that the acts complained of were a product of a municipal policy of the County. Pembaur v. City of Cincinnati, et al., 746 F.2d 337, 341 (6th Cir.1984). The United States Supreme Court granted plaintiff's petition for certiorari solely to review the dismissal of the claims against Hamilton County. On March 25, 1986, the Supreme Court issued its opinion reversing our decision with respect to the County. Pembaur v. City of Cincinnati, --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 1292, 89 L.Ed.2d 452 (1986).
In accordance therewith, it is hereby ORDERED that this Court's prior judgment is VACATED, the district court order dismissing the claim against the County is REVERSED, and this case is REMANDED with instructions to reinstate the County as a defendant.