Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Haitian Refugee Center, an Unincorporated, Not-for Profitorganization, et al., Plaintiffs-appellees, v. Edwin Meese, Iii, et al., Defendants-appellants
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. - 804 F.2d 1573
Dec. 4, 1986
William Kanter, Michael Jay Singer, John S. Koppel, Appellate Staff Civil Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for defendants-appellants.
Thomas R. Kline, Brown Roady Bonvillian & Gold, Chartered, Washington, D.C., Mary D. Dick, Ira Kurzban, Miami, Fla., for plaintiffs-appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida.
Before CLARK, Circuit Judge, HENDERSON*, Senior Circuit Judge, and HOFFMAN**, Senior District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
On Petition for Rehearing
At page 1500 of our prior opinion in this case, we discussed the subject of "Fees for Fees." Upon consideration of the petition for rehearing and the plaintiffs-appellees' response thereto, it is
ORDERED that the opinion be vacated as to that portion thereof which considers the subject of "Fees for Fees," but in all other respects the petition for rehearing is DENIED. Under the circumstances of this particular case, we are of the opinion that "fees for fees" should not be allowed.
By reason of this action, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED in part, and REVERSED in part.
On Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc
The suggestion for rehearing is DENIED and no member of this panel nor other judge in regular active service on the court having requested that the court be polled on rehearing en banc (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Eleventh Circuit Rule 26), the Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.