Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Richard Andrade, Petitioner-appellant, v. O.l. Mccotter, Director, Texas Department of Corrections,respondent-appellee
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. - 807 F.2d 398
Dec. 16, 1986
Richard Andrade, pro se.
Jim Mattox, Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., for respondent-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas; Hayden W. Head, Jr., Judge.
Before POLITZ, WILLIAMS, and JONES, Circuit Judges.
Prior Report: 700 S.W.2d 585.
POLITZ, Circuit Judge:
The matter is now before this court, precipitated by a pro se pleading which we shall consider to be a notice of appeal, a request for a certificate of probable cause, and a request for a stay of execution.
The district court denied Richard Andrade's "second and eleventh hour" application for a writ of habeas corpus, stay of execution, and request for a certificate of probable cause, finding that petitioner had failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a federal right. Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880, 103 S.Ct. 3383, 77 L.Ed.2d 1090 (1983).
We glean from the pleadings that Andrade raises a sixth amendment ineffective assistance of counsel claim. The district court rejected that claim because Andrade failed to allege any facts that would constitute a violation of the standard announced in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). We agree.
Further, the district court found this application to be an abuse of the writ. 28 U.S.C. foll. Sec. 2254, Rule 9(b). Having concluded that Andrade has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a federal right, we must deny the requested certificate of probable cause, Barefoot v. Estelle, and therefore do not reach this issue.
The request for a certificate of probable cause is DENIED; the motion for stay of execution is DENIED; the judgment of the trial court stands AFFIRMED.