Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Robert Walter Woltz, Plaintiff--appellant, v. John Wilt, Warden; Mrs. Mary Bullock, C. O.; Sgt. Jones,c.o.; Sgt. Wright, C.o.; Officer Young, C.o.; Officerrichert, C.o.; Captain Heard, C.o.; Mr. Paris,classification Officer, Defendants--appellees
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. - 815 F.2d 74Unpublished Disposition
Submitted Feb. 11, 1987.Decided March 26, 1987
Before PHILLIPS, MURNAGHAN,and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.
Robert Walter Woltz, appellant pro se.
Stephen Howard Sachs, Attorney General; Rex Charles Schultz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM:
Judgment in this case was entered on April 1, 1986. The notice of appeal was filed on September 29, 1986, outside the 30-day period specified in Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). No motion for extension of time within which to note an appeal was filed in the following 30-day period, see Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5). Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to consider the appeal. See Shah v. Hutto, 722 F.2d 1167 (4th Cir. 1983) (en banc), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 975 (1984). Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and dismiss the appeal.
DISMISSED.