Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Margaret Holland; Donna Ramsey; Carolyn Webster; Garnettealexander, Plaintiff, v. Dewey Bone, Individually and As Principal of Sylviaelementary School, Defendant-appellee,andwilliam Baker, Individually and As County Superintendentofschools of Raleigh County; the Board Ofeducation of the County of Raleigh, Astatutory Corporation, Defendant, v. Continental Casualty Company, a Foreign Corporation, Thirdparty Defendant- Appellant
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. - 818 F.2d 28Unpublished Disposition
Argued April 7, 1987.Decided April 30, 1987
Before WINTER, Chief Judge, ERVIN, Circuit Judge and ANDERSON, United States District Judge for the District of South Carolina, sitting by designation.
Daniel R. Schuda (w. Randolph Fife; Steptoe & Johnson on brief) for Appellant; Warren Ashby Thornhill, III (Thornhill, Kennedy, & Vaughan on brief) for appellee.
PER CURIAM:
Dewey Bone and Continental Casualty Company (Continental) litigated the question of whether Continental was liable for counsel fees for an attorney employed by Bone to represent him in a suit instituted by various teachers against him and other defendants. Continental was the liability insurer of Bone and the other defendants and had covenanted to defend them. The district court ruled Continental liable, and Continental appeals. We affirm.
With commendable candor, Continental, in its reply brief and in oral argument, now tells us that it admits that there was a conflict of interest between Bone and the other insureds which became apparent as the teachers' suit progressed. We think that the nature of the conflict was such that it exi.sted from the onset of the teachers' suit. Although Bone employed his own counsel without proper notice to Continental and without affording Continental the right to select the lawyer to represent Bone, we perceive no prejudice to Continental. It makes no claim that it would have provided either more able or less expensive representation.
It follows that the judgment of the district court should not be disturbed.
AFFIRMED.