Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Alfred Eugene Mcdaniel, Plaintiff-appellant, v. States Attorney of Dorchester County, Hugh C. Vinson,governor Hughes, State of Maryland, Dorchestercounty, the Mayor of Cambridge,maryland, the City Ofcambridge, Defendant-appellee
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. - 828 F.2d 17Unpublished Disposition
Submitted April 14, 1987.Decided August 19, 1987
Alfred Eugene McDaniel, appellant pro se.
Stephen Howard Sachs, Attorney General, Richard M. Kastendieck, Office of the Attorney General, for appellees.
Before JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. McDaniel v. States Attorney, CA-85-4801-M (D. Md., Dec. 22, 1986).
AFFIRMED.