Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Ronald Graham, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Michael C. Samberg, Patricia Johnson, G. Hinkle, Garymckinsely, B. Eggleston, Sgt. Guy, Sgt. Richardson, Sgt.running, Lt. Parker, Major Lawman, Officer Whitfield,officer Bullock, Officer Town, Mr. Grise, Commissarymanager, D.e. Groome, Mrs. Resnick, Mrs. Kafka, Lt. Hubbard,officer Gray, Counselor Young, Officer L. Sim, Lt. Hendrick,defendant-appellee
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. - 828 F.2d 17Unpublished Disposition
Submitted May 28, 1987.Decided August 18, 1987
Ronald Graham, appellant pro se.
Mary Sue Terry, Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, for appellees.
Before RUSSELL, WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, dispense with oral argument and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Graham v. Samberg, C/A No. 86-515-R (E.D. Va., Mar. 16, 1987).
DISMISSED.