Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Douglas Shuler, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Harry Allsbrook, Roger Dickerson, Joseph Callahan,defendants-appellees
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. - 828 F.2d 17Unpublished Disposition
Submitted January 20, 1987.Decided August 18, 1987
Douglas Shuler, appellant pro se.
Before SPROUSE and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Douglas Shuler, a North Carolina inmate, appeals the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 suit. The district court will be affirmed as Shuler's claim is frivolous.
Shuler alleges that his constitutional rights were violated when guards negligently left his opened mail on a card table after mail call. Shuler has not alleged that anyone read his mail or that he has suffered any harm. '[T]he protections of the Due Process Clause, whether procedural or substantive, are just not triggered by lack of due care by prison officials.' Davidson v. Cannon, ---- U.S. ----, 54 U.S.L.W. 4095, 4096 (Jan. 21, 1986); see Daniels v. Williams, ---- U.S. ----, 54 U.S.L.W. 4090 (Jan. 21, 1986). Shuler's claim is frivolous. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the district court's dismissal of this action.
AFFIRMED.