Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Christopher Bryant, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Chief Kilpatrick, James Reed, Defendant-appellee
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. - 828 F.2d 17Unpublished Disposition
Submitted June 26, 1987.Decided August 18, 1987
Christopher Bryant, appellant pro se.
Richard Temple Rice, Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, Jean P. Werner, for appellees.
Before WIDENER, ERVIN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Christopher Bryant, a North Carolina inmate, brought this 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action alleging that the defendant police officers assaulted him and used excessive force during his arrest. The action was referred to the magistrate for trial pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636(c). After hearing all the evidence, the jury rendered a verdict for the defendants.
On appeal, Bryant makes the following contentions:
(1) his attorney failed to call three additional witnesses who were familiar with his physical condition when he was released from jail;
(2) the police changed their story under oath three different times;
(3) Officer Reid was terminated for not being truthful five months after this action was filed;
(4) an improper number of persons from Wayne County, the county where the incident took place, served as jurors at his trial;
(5) the district court erroneously refused to allow testimony that the Fremont Police Department had harassed him and his family on several occasions prior to the beating; and
(6) the defense attorney appeared to ask for sympathy during closing arguments.
We have reviewed these contentions and find no basis for disturbing the verdict against Bryant. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment below. We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively.
AFFIRMED.