Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
William H. Bramble, Sfc, Plaintiff-appellant, v. U.S. Army Fort Meade, Maryland, Defendant-appellee
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. - 846 F.2d 69Unpublished Disposition
Submitted March 30, 1988.Decided May 9, 1988
William H. Bramble, appellant pro se.
Richard L. Willcox, United States Attorney, Roann Nichols, Office of United States Attorney, Richard O. Hatch, United States Army, for appellee.
Before DONALD RUSSELL and JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from that court's order dismissing plaintiff's discrimination complaint brought under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e-16(c) is without merit. We accordingly affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Bramble v. U.S. Army Fort Meade, C/A No. 87-2035 (D.Md. Dec. 21, 1987). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.