Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Maurice Dahl, Gary Clark, W. Grantham, Robert Daniele,charles Dahl, Dowayne Bockman, Ray Dilbeck, Richard Koon,art Overgarrd, Jack Yeager, Accra Tronics Seals Corp., Andaaron Heller, Plaintiffs-appellees, v. Billy J. "b.j." Pinter, Black Gold Oil Company, Pinterenergy Company, and Pinter Oil Company,defendants-appellants
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. - 857 F.2d 262
Oct. 14, 1988
Braden W. Sparks, Newman, Shook & McManemin, Dallas, Tex., for defendants-appellants.
John A. Spinuzzi, Denton, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas; A. Joe Fish, Judge.
Before BROWN and REAVLEY, Circuit Judges.*
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of this court (787 F.2d 985; 794 F.2d 1016) affirming the district court's judgment for plaintiff Dahl has been vacated by the Supreme Court. --- U.S. ----, 108 S.Ct. 2063, 100 L.Ed.2d 658 (1988). The Court called for further findings to meet the standards it established for determining (1) the availability of an in pari delicto defense under Sec. 12(1) of the Securities Act of 1933, and (2) status as a statutory seller for purposes of imposing liability under Sec. 12(1). The cause is remanded to the district court for further findings consistent with the Supreme Court's holdings and for determination, if appropriate, of contribution to Pinter by Dahl. The district court may, if it chooses, take additional evidence on these issues.
REMANDED.