Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Kenneth Michael Julian, Plaintiff-appellee, v. United States Department of Justice, Defendant-appellant.margaret J. Wallace, Plaintiff-appellee, v. United States Parole Commission, and Charles Turnbo, Warden,f.c.i., Pleasanton, Ca, Defendants-appellants
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. - 859 F.2d 124
Oct. 12, 1988
Before WALLACE, ALARCON and BEEZER, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
The Supreme Court's mandate of May 16, 1988, --- U.S. ----, 108 S.Ct. 1606, 100 L.Ed.2d 1, affirmed this court's opinion in Julian v. U.S. Department of Justice, No. 85-2649 and Wallace v. U.S. Parole Commission, No. 85-2751, 806 F.2d 1411. We remand to the district court for further proceedings consistent with our opinion and the Supreme Court's mandate.
Subsequent to the issuance of the Supreme Court's mandate, Margaret J. Wallace, appearing pro per, filed or lodged in this court the following items:
(1) "Amendment to Complaint, Emergency Motion for Damages and Clearance of Record;"
(2) "Amendment to Complaint, Motion to Reopen or Rehearing;"
(3) "Amendment to Complaint, Motion to Restate or Rehearing."
The Clerk of this court is directed to transmit to the Clerk, United States District Court for the Northern District of California, certified copies of each of the above-referenced papers and the district judge is directed to dispose of the additional claims of Wallace in the exercise of original jurisdiction.