Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
William Lyle Woratzeck, Petitioner-appellant, v. James R. Ricketts, and Donald Wawrzaszek, Respondents-appellees
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. - 859 F.2d 1559
Nov. 7, 1988
James J. Syme, Jr., Glendale, Ariz., for petitioner-appellant.
Crane McClennen, Phoenix, Ariz., for respondents-appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona.
Before WALLACE, FARRIS and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges.
The Supreme Court, --- U.S. ----, 108 S.Ct. 2815, 100 L.Ed.2d 916, has ordered the judgment vacated and remanded the cause to us "for further consideration in light of Maynard v. Cartwright, 486 U.S. ---- [108 S.Ct. 1853, 100 L.Ed.2d 372] (1988)." In compliance with the Supreme Court's mandate, we hereby vacate the district court's judgment and remand for further consideration in light of Maynard.
The district court is advised that Adamson v. Ricketts, 789 F.2d 722 (9th Cir.1986) (en banc), rev'd, --- U.S. ----, 107 S.Ct. 2680, 97 L.Ed.2d 1 (1987), is pending before this court en banc. That decision, when filed, should also be considered by the district court.