Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Noel Mckenzie, A/k/a Zeke, Defendant-appellant
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. - 865 F.2d 1260Unpublished Disposition
Submitted: Nov. 7, 1988.Decided: Jan. 3, 1989
William Purpura for appellant.
Breckinridge L. Willcox, United States Attorney; Glenda G. Gordon, Assistant United States Attorney, for appellee.
Before MURNAGHAN, CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Noel McKenzie faced a multi-charge indictment for cocaine and marijuana violations. By plea agreement he pled guilty to an offense of marijuana importation but not guilty to other charges.
As a result of the guilty plea, McKenzie was sentenced to 15 years for violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 963, a statute dealing with marijuana offenses, which carried a maximum penalty of 40 years imprisonment. McKenzie asserts impermissible conduct on the part of the district judge in considering cocaine charges which were dismissed under the plea agreement when fixing sentence.
It appears, however, that Judge Howard specifically stated he was considering only marijuana matters when he decided upon an appropriate sentence. He said:
Basically I find grounds for sentencing in this case in the first three pages of government's version and it all deals with marijuana.
The sentence was within statutory limits and so in ordinary cases immune to review for sufficiency. United States v. Shavers, 820 F.2d 1375 (4th Cir.1987). We perceive no extraordinary reasons for departing from that holding.
In addition the government pointed to that part of the plea agreement conferring on the United States Attorney's office:
the right to bring to the Court's attention and the Court has the right to consider all relevant information with regard to Mr. McKenzie's background, character and conduct, including the conduct which underlies Counts 2 and 3 of the indictment [those dealing with cocaine]....
The complaint objecting to consideration by the judge of cocaine trafficking was, therefore, waived.
The judgment is, accordingly,
AFFIRMED.