Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Unpublished Dispositionnational Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, v. David Clements Company, Inc., David Clements, Jr., a Soleproprietor D/b/a Michigan Seat Frame Recoverycompany & Automotive Seat Frame Recoverycompany, Respondents
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. - 865 F.2d 1268
Jan. 3, 1989
ORDER
Before MILBURN and ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judges, and RICHARD F. SUHRHEINRICH, District Judge.*
The National Labor Relations Board (Board) applies to this Court for enforcement, by stipulation, of its August 5, 1988, decision and order adopting a Settlement Stipulation entered into by the respondents. The respondents also apply for enforcement, but insist this Court's judgment must include reference to a Compliance Agreement submitted to the Board by the respondents after the Board filed its application herein. Alternatively, the respondents seek a remand of this case to the Board so the Compliance Agreement can be adopted formally and made part of the Settlement Stipulation. The Board opposes the respondents' application and the alternative relief sought therein.
The Settlement Stipulation included a provision providing that it "contain[ed] the entire agreement between the parties, there being no agreement of any kind, verbal or otherwise, which varies, alters or adds to it...." (p 14). It further provided that this Court may, upon application of the Board, enter judgment enforcing the Board's decision and order adopting the Stipulation. The respondents expressly waived any defenses to the entry of such judgment (p 13).
We have examined the Settlement Stipulation, the Board's decision and order, and the Compliance Agreement. We conclude the Board's decision and order should be enforced without reference to the Compliance Agreement.
It therefore is ORDERED that the Board's application for enforcement of its August 5, 1988, decision and order is granted. To the extent the respondents' application for enforcement varies therefrom, it is denied. The respondents, their officers, agents, successors, and assigns shall abide by and perform the directions of the Board in said decision and order contained.