Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Oregon Natural Resources Council, Oregon Guides and Packersassociation, Inc., Rogue Flyfishers, Inc., Androgue River Guides Association,plaintiffs-appellants, v. John O. Marsh, Jr., in His Official Capacity As Secretary Ofthe United States Department of the Army, and Elvin R.heiberg, Iii, in His Official Capacity As Chief of Engineersof the United States Department of the Army, Defendants-appellees
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. - 880 F.2d 242
July 24, 1989
Before WALLACE, FERGUSON and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
The decision of the district court denying an injunction to stop construction by the Army Corps of Engineers of a dam on Elk Creek in southern Oregon was affirmed in part and reversed in part by this court, Judge Wallace concurring in part and dissenting in part. Oregon Natural Resources Council v. Marsh, 832 F.2d 1489 (9th Cir.1987).
The Supreme Court, in Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources Council, --- U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 1851, 104 L.Ed.2d 377 (1989), reversed only in part the decision of this court regarding the material that must be set forth in an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) prepared pursuant to the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The other parts of this court's decision were neither challenged by the parties nor considered by the Supreme Court.
The decision of the district court is affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for entry of appropriate relief consistent with the opinions of this court and the Supreme Court.
All applications for attorney fees are remanded to the district court for appropriate disposition.