Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
James Arthur Brown, Jr., Plaintiff-appellant, v. Edward W. Murray, Director; Toni v. Bair, Regionaladministrator; David Williams, Warden, Powhatan; Laytonlaster, Treatment and Programs, Powhatan; Pat Edge,assistant Treatment and Programs, Powhatan, Defendants-appellees
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. - 894 F.2d 401Unpublished Disposition
Submitted: Nov. 30, 1989.Decided: Jan. 5, 1990
James Arthur Brown, Jr., appellant pro se.
Jeanette Dian Rogers, Office of the Attorney General, for appellees.
Before K.K. HALL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
James Arthur Brown, Jr. appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.* Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Brown v. Murray, CA-89-487-N (E.D.Va., Sept. 8, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.