Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Signtech Incorporated, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company, Defendant-appellee
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. - 895 F.2d 1421
Jan. 23, 1990
Before RICH, Circuit Judge, COWEN, Senior Circuit Judge, and PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.
RICH, Circuit Judge.
DECISION
This appeal is from the 21 June 1989 Order of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland granting the motion of Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company to dismiss this action without prejudice. We affirm.
OPINION
Having reviewed the contentions of the parties and the evidence they rely on in support of their respective contentions, we find no abuse of discretion by Judge Smalkin in his decision to dismiss the complaint in this action without prejudice so that trial of the same issues between the parties hereto may proceed in the pending suit in the District Court for the Western District of Texas. This case is distinguishable on its facts from the recent decision of this court in Kahn v. General Motors Corp., 889 F.2d 1078, 12 USPQ2d 1997 (Fed.Cir.1989). Here the Texas suit was brought by the patentee to acquire jurisdiction against the asserted infringing manufacturer who was not a party to the Maryland declaratory judgment action. We agree that complete relief can best be afforded in the Texas suit. We affirm Judge Smalkin's decision to dismiss for the reasons stated in his Memorandum Opinion of even date with the order appealed from.