Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Appalachian Agency for Senior Citizens; Mountain Empireolder Citizens; New River Valley Agency on Aging; Districtiii Governmental Cooperative; Jefferson Area Board Foraging, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. Wilda Ferguson, Commissioner, Virginia Department for Theaging, Defendant-appellee
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. - 902 F.2d 27Unpublished Disposition
Argued Jan. 9, 1990.Decided April 13, 1990
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. Glen W. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-88-123-B)
Gerald L. Gray, Gerald L. Gray, P.C., Clintwood, Va., argued, for appellants.
Carol Smith Nance, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Va., for appellee;
Mary Sue Terry, Attorney General, John A. Rupp, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Va., on brief.
W.D.Va., 702 F.Supp. 1262.
DISMISSED AND REMANDED.
Before SPROUSE and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges, and HOFFMAN, Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Virginia, sitting by designation.
PER CURIAM:
The Appalachian Agency for Senior Citizens, et al, appeal the district court order granting summary judgment to the defendant and upholding Virginia's formula for distributing Title III funds of the Older Americans Act, 42 U.S.C. Secs. 3021 et seq. After this appeal was filed, the Virginia Department for the Aging promulgated a new funding formula which supersedes the contested formula.
The promulgation of the new funding formula has rendered this appeal moot. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed and remanded with leave granted for the appellant agencies to file an amended complaint and to submit such further evidence as may be appropriate.
DISMISSED AND REMANDED