Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Unpublished Dispositionnotice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related Cases.william A. Baranow, Petitioner, Appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent, Appellee
United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. - 915 F.2d 1557
Sept. 20, 1990
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maine Gene Carter, District Judge.
William A. Baranow on brief pro se.
Richard S. Cohen, United States Attorney and F. Mark Terison, Assistant United States Attorney, on brief, for appellee.
D.Me., 703 F.Supp. 134.
AFFIRMED.
Before TORRUELLA, SELYA and CYR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Baranow has preserved the following issues for appeal: (1) whether the government violated due process by relying on the allegedly perjured testimony of Richard Bellino; (2) whether the government concealed the existence of John Frank and thereby withheld exculpatory evidence; and (3) whether his attorney provided ineffective assistance by failing to cross-examine Bellino and failing to uncover Frank's existence. We think the district court has properly disposed of each of these issues in its opinion, reported at 703 F.Supp. 134 (D.Me.1988). We affirm substantially for the reasons stated therein.