United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Robert Craig and Peter v. Pappas, Defendants-appellants.united States of America, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Frank P. North, Jr., and Estate of Jack E. Walker,defendants-appellees

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. - 919 F.2d 57

Nov. 13, 1990

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No. 74 CR 879, Brian Barnett Duff, Judge.

1

Before WOOD, Jr., and POSNER, Circuit Judges, and CRABB, District Judge.*

2

ORDER

3

The slip opinion issued in the above-entitled case on July 16, 1990, 907 F.2d 653, (7th Cir.1990) is hereby amended.

4

Page 14, 907 F.2d page 660, first complete paragraph, the last sentence starting with the word "Accordingly" should read as follows:

5

Accordingly, the Walker estate's petition should be dismissed for want of subject-matter jurisdiction and the case is remanded to the district court with instructions to vacate its previous orders relating to the estate and dismiss the estate's petition; the judgment of the district court denying a writ of error coram nobis to Robert Craig and Peter V. Pappas is affirmed; and the judgment of the district court granting a writ of error coram nobis to Frank P. North, Jr., is reversed.

6

Page 14, 907 F.2d page 660 last paragraph, should read as follows: "AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS."

7

On consideration of the petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing in banc filed in the above-entitled cause by defendants-appellants and defendants-appellees on July 30, 1990, no judge in active service has requested a vote thereon, and all of the judges on the original panel have voted to deny a rehearing. Accordingly,

8

IT IS ORDERED that the aforesaid petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing in banc be, and the same is hereby, DENIED.