Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Bob Geary; Robert Silvestri; Dennis Mark; Melissagundrun; Wayne Johnson; David Soule; Max Woods; Peterjohnson; Robert Gebert; Election Action; Terencefaulkner; and Sudi Trippet, Plaintiffs-appellees, v. Louise Renne, San Francisco City Attorney; Diannefeinstein, San Francisco Mayor; Board of Supervisors, Cityand County of San Francisco; City and County of Sanfrancisco, and Jay Patterson, San Francisco Registrar Ofvoters, Defendants-appellants
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. - 943 F.2d 32
Aug. 23, 1991
David Benjamin, Deputy City Atty., and Dennis Aftergut, Chief Asst. City Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellants.
Arlo Hale Smith, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellees.
Anthony Saul Alperin, Asst. City Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for amicus curiae, Tom Bradley, Mayor of the City of Los Angeles.
Cedric C. Chao, Morrison & Foerster, San Francisco, Cal., for amicus curiae, California Democratic Party, et al.
Curtis M. Fitzpatrick, Asst. City Atty., San Diego, Cal., for amicus curiae, City of San Diego, et al.
Ephraim Margolin, San Francisco, Cal., for amicus curiae, San Francisco County Democratic Cent. Committee, et al.
Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and GOODWIN, TANG, SCHROEDER, ALARCON, REINHARDT, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, LEAVY, FERNANDEZ and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
Pursuant to the mandate of the Supreme Court, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 2331, 115 L.Ed.2d 288, this cause is remanded to the district court to dismiss the third cause of action without prejudice, no party to recover costs or attorneys fees in this court.