Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Hans H. Wehrli, Plaintiff, v. James Pagliotti; City of Los Angeles, et al., Defendants-appellees,hugh R. Manes, Esq., Real-party-in-interest-appellant
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. - 947 F.2d 1424
Nov. 5, 1991
Ben Margolis, Litt & Stormer, Los Angeles, Cal., for real-party-in-interest-appellant.
Norman N. Hirata, Deputy City Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellee.
Before GOODWIN, PREGERSON, and ALARCON, Circuit Judges.
Upon reconsideration, a thorough examination of the record has disclosed an abundance of material that was not included in appellant's brief. Unfortunately, appellees filed no opposition brief nor any other papers before this court to assist us in deciding this matter.
After reviewing the record, particularly the transcripts, we conclude that the district judge exercised commendable restraint in dealing with counsel for both parties. The record establishes that counsel failed to provide the court with the assistance on jury instructions and special verdict forms that judges would normally expect from counsel.
We also conclude that the district court's factual findings regarding the sanctions imposed were not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the opinion filed August 1, 1991 is vacated and ordered withdrawn from publication. The district court's judgment imposing sanctions is
AFFIRMED.