Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Nathaniel Lewis Howard, Jr., Plaintiff-appellant, v. David A. Williams, Warden, Defendant-appellee.nathaniel Lewis Howard, Jr., Plaintiff-appellant, v. David A. Williams, Warden, Defendant-appellee
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. - 952 F.2d 395
Submitted Oct. 17, 1991.Decided Jan. 2, 1992
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. (CA-90-147-AM, CA-90-125-AM), James C. Cacheris, Chief District Judge.
Nathaniel Lewis Howard, Jr., appellant pro se.
Jeanette Dian Rogers, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Va., for appellee.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, K.K. HALL and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Nathaniel Lewis Howard appeals from the district court's orders denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988).* Our review of the records and the district court's opinion discloses that these appeals are without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Howard v. Williams, No. CA-90-147-AM, CA-90-125-AM (E.D.Va. June 4, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.