Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Derek Dion Curtis, I, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Robert Mcdowell, F.b.i. Agent; Special Agent in Charge;federal Bureau of Investigation; John Does; Janedoes, Defendants-appellees.derek Dion Curtis, I, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Robert Bergin; Jane Irwin; Ronald Schwartz, Captain,baltimore County Police Department; Kalista, Captain,baltimore County Police Department; Robert Mcdowell;patricia Bach; John Doe; Jane Doe, Defendants-appellees.derek Dion Curtis, I, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Friedland; Furniture Quarter's Store, Defendants-appellees
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. - 955 F.2d 40
Submitted Feb. 3, 1992.Decided Feb. 14, 1992.As Amended March, 24, 1992
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Walter E. Black, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-91-902-B, CA-91-1291-B, CA-91-1513-B)
Derek Dion Curtis, I, appellant pro se.
Richard Douglas Bennett, United States Attorney, Juliet Ann Eurich, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Md., John Alston, Baltimore County Office of Law, Towson, Md., Ronald Schwartz, Baltimore County Police Department, Catonsville, Md., for appellees.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Derek Dion Curtis, I appeals from the district court's order which granted summary judgment to the Defendants in his three complaints filed pursuant to Bivins v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that these appeals are without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Curtis v. McDowell, No. CA-91-902-B; Curtis v. Bergin, No. CA-91-1291-B; Curtis v. Friedland, No. CA-91-1513-B (D.Md. Oct. 25, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.