Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Bert H. Mackie; Norma Pace; John N. Griesemer; Crockernevin; Marvin T. Runyon; Michael S. Coughlin v. William J. Clinton, in His Official Capacity As President Ofthe United States of America, Appellant
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. - 10 F.3d 13
Oct. 27, 1993
Before: WALD, WILLIAMS and HENDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of appellant's motion to dismiss appeal and for vacatur on grounds of mootness, and the lack of any response thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion be granted. The appeal of the district court's order granting a preliminary injunction against appellant has become moot. Accordingly, the order of the district court filed January 7, 1993, granting a preliminary injunction against appellant, is hereby vacated. See United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 39-40 (1950); Clarke v. United States, 915 F.2d 699, 706 (D.C.Cir.1990) (a court of appeals will generally vacate a district court decision that becomes moot prior to the appellate court's disposition). Also, because a grant of preliminary injunction by a district court does not involve a final decision based on the merits of the parties' contentions, when the injunctive aspects of the case become moot on appeal of the preliminary injunction, any remaining issues cannot be resolved on appeal. See University of Texas v. Camenisch, 451 U.S. 390, 393-96 (1981).
The Clerk is directed to issue forthwith a certified copy of this order to the district court in lieu of formal mandate.