Case Resources
Search this Case
in
Google Scholar
on the Web
Google
Web Search
MSN
Web Search
Yahoo!
Web Search
in the News
Google
News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google
Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google
Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
United States of America, Appellee, v. Niko L. Richard, Appellant
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. - 10 F.3d 13
Nov. 12, 1993
Before: MIKVA, Chief Judge, BUCKLEY and GINSBURG, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, on the briefs of counsel, and on oral argument. The arguments have been accorded full consideration by the court and occasion no need for a published opinion. See D.C.Cir.Rule 14(c).
We affirm the decision of the district court denying the appellant's motion to suppress. For the reasons stated in the district court's memorandum opinion, the officers had reasonable suspicion to stop appellant for questioning. Having stopped him, they had reasonable suspicion to search him for weapons for their own protection. See Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968); United States v. Sokolow, 490 U.S. 1 (1989). Accordingly, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the district court's judgment from which this appeal has been taken be affirmed.
The clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 15.