|
Citation
|
Date
|
Circuit
|
Parties
|
|
101 F.3d 1
|
Nov 20, 1996
|
First
|
Michael D. Veilleux, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Jeffrey Perschau, Detective for the Manchester Policedepartment,
Defendant, Appellee
|
|
101 F.3d 3
|
Nov 19, 1996
|
Second
|
Satcorp International Group and Sino American Trading Corp.,plaintiffs-appellees, v. China National Silk
Import & Export Corporation, Defendant,andhugh H. Mo, Esq., Appellant
|
|
101 F.3d 7
|
Nov 21, 1996
|
Second
|
Miller Tabak Hirsch & Co., Mth Holdings, Inc., Tax Matterspartner, Petitioners-appellees, v. Commissioner
of Internal Revenue, Respondent-appellant
|
|
101 F.3d 11
|
Nov 21, 1996
|
Second
|
Joel Proyect, Petitioner-appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-appellee
|
|
101 F.3d 14
|
Nov 22, 1996
|
Second
|
Mary Ellen Jannsen, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Judith v. Condo, Director of Albany County Rape Crisiscenter, and
County of Albany, Defendants-appellees
|
|
101 F.3d 17
|
Nov 22, 1996
|
Second
|
United States of America, Appellee, v. Anthony Edwards, Defendant-appellant
|
|
101 F.3d 20
|
Nov 22, 1996
|
Second
|
Lawrence M. Farkas, Plaintiff-appellant,joseph M. Aemisego; Anthony R. Alfano; Jose Almeida;charles Anderson;
Mike Antonucci; Richard Arroyo; Johnbarone; Lawrence Bischofsberger; Richard Bottari; Andrej. Brown; John Calabro; George A. Calandrino; Petecapuano; R. Caserta; Vincent
Castronuovo; Thomas Clark;marvin Clausell; Jerome D'aguiar; Peter Dalton; Nickdefeis; Salvatore Demaria; Joseph Depaso; Donalddickinson; Augustine Disalvo; Jose J. Escobar;
Lawrencej. Faughnan; John Feltham; Chet Flower; Wilfred Foster;michael Foti; Robert Galassi; Frank J. Gallagher; John I.gerace; George A. Gerhens; William Germann; Michael Gold;john
M. Guido; Kenneth Hampton; William Harrington;brian Harrison; Gerard Hart; Charles A. Hendricks;santiago Hernandez; Larry Hollenbeck; Raymond Hoye; Bobhyland; Cornelio Iacono;
Chester Jabacinski; Walterjacome; Lehman Jenkins; Robert Johnson; John Jones; Johnc. Richards, Jr.; Clifton Oates, Jr.; Manfred Kalkowski;charles J. Keller; John Kleppe; Anthony J.
Lafemina; Paulf. Lehnert; Michae
|
|
101 F.3d 23
|
Nov 18, 1996
|
Fourth
|
72 Fair Empl.prac.cas. (bna) 1232,69 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 44,385stanley J. Jakubiak, Plaintiff-appellant, v.
William J. Perry, Secretary of Defense, Defendant-appellee
|
|
101 F.3d 28
|
Nov 20, 1996
|
Fifth
|
Hughes Christensen Company, Petitioner-cross-respondent, v. National Labor Relations Board,
Respondent-cross-petitioner
|
|
101 F.3d 32
|
Nov 22, 1996
|
Fifth
|
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Reginald B. Gist, Defendant-appellant
|
|
101 F.3d 35
|
Nov 25, 1996
|
Fifth
|
William Robinson, Plaintiff-appellee Cross-appellant, v. Global Marine Drilling Company, Defendant-appellant
Cross-appellee
|
|
101 F.3d 37
|
Dec 06, 1996
|
Fifth
|
Henry E. Vail, Petitioner, v. Securities and Exchange Commission, Respondent
|
|
101 F.3d 40
|
Dec 09, 1996
|
Fifth
|
F.c. Schaffer & Associates, Inc., Plaintiff-appellant, v. Demech Contractors, Ltd.,
Defendant-appellee
|
|
101 F.3d 44
|
Nov 20, 1996
|
Sixth
|
52 Soc.sec.rep.ser. 169, Medicare & Medicaid Guidep 44,900richard Levin, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Masten
Childers, Ii, Medicaid Commissioner and Secretary Ofthe Cabinet for Human Resources, Commonwealth Ofkentucky, Defendant-appellee
|
|
101 F.3d 48
|
Nov 22, 1996
|
Sixth
|
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Bobby M. Keeton (95-6086) and Kim G. Davis
(95-6087),defendants-appellants
|
|
101 F.3d 52
|
Nov 15, 1996
|
Seventh
|
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Floyd Elodius Cotton, Sr., Defendant-appellee
|
|
101 F.3d 57
|
Nov 15, 1996
|
Seventh
|
Guaranty National Title Company, Inc., Plaintiff-appellant, v. J.e.g. Associates, Defendant-appellee
|
|
101 F.3d 60
|
Nov 18, 1996
|
Seventh
|
Daniel Robert Schluga, Plaintiff-appellant, v. City of Milwaukee, Defendant-appellee
|
|
101 F.3d 63
|
Nov 21, 1996
|
Seventh
|
Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc., Plaintiff-appellee, v. Fru-con Construction Corporation and Fru-con
Engineeringinc., Defendants-appellants
|
|
101 F.3d 66
|
Oct 30, 1996
|
Eighth
|
Mourad Abu Remileh, Petitioner, v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Respondent
|
|
101 F.3d 68
|
Nov 21, 1996
|
Eighth
|
Yoganand Premachandra, Petitioner-appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-appellee
|
|
101 F.3d 70
|
Nov 22, 1996
|
Eighth
|
Wesley G. Thorn; Cheri Thorn, Plaintiff/appellants, v. International Business Machines, Inc.,
Defendant/appellee,honeywell, Inc., Defendant
|
|
101 F.3d 75
|
Dec 06, 1996
|
Eighth
|
United States of America, Appellee, v. Gary Apker, Appellant
|
|
101 F.3d 76
|
Nov 20, 1996
|
Ninth
|
Marsilio Digiovanni, As Trustee of the Digiovanni Familytrust, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Michael Kjessler and
Robert W. Cochran, Plaintiffs-intervenors.fishing Vessel Owners & Marine Ways, Inc.,plaintiff-intervenor-appellant, v. Peter M. Mcmahon, a Single Man; John Frankenfield, in
Hisseparate Estate and Bayside/bayview Yacht Sales Inc., an Wacorp., in Personam; M/v Royal Princess, O.n., 566682, Herengines, Machinery, Appurtenances, Etc. in Rem, Defendants
|
|
101 F.3d 80
|
Nov 18, 1996
|
Ninth
|
96 Cal. Daily Op. Ser v. 8284, 96 Daily Journald.a.r. 13,781united States of America, Plaintiff-appellant, v.
Gregory Alan Etherton, Defendant-appellee
|
|
101 F.3d 82
|
Nov 20, 1996
|
Ninth
|
96 Cal. Daily Op. Ser v. 8387, 96 Daily Journald.a.r. 13,956united States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v.
Alan Keith Hunter, Defendant-appellant.united States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Bart Reed, Defendant-appellant
|
|
101 F.3d 86
|
Nov 21, 1996
|
Ninth
|
Frank Adkins; Robert Kean; Federico Montinez; John D.johnson; Jerry Kahklen, et al., Claimants-appellants, v.
Trans-alaska Pipeline Liability Fund, Defendant-appellee
|
|
101 F.3d 90
|
Nov 22, 1996
|
Ninth
|
Medicare & Medicaid Guide P 44,913,96 Cal. Daily Op. Ser v. 8484,96 Daily Journal D.a.r. 14,038paul M.
Gamboa, Plaintiff-appellant/cross-appellee, v. Susan M. Chandler,* Director, Dept. of Humanservices, State of Hawai'i,defendant-third-party-plaintiff-appellee/cross-appellant, v.
Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of Health & Human Services,defendant-third-party-defendant-appellee.paul M. Gamboa, Plaintiff-appellee/cross-appellee, v. Susan M. Chandler,
Director, Dept. of Human Services, Stateof Hawai'i,defendant-third-party-plaintiff-appellant/cross-appellant, v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of Health & Human
Services,defendant-third-party-defendant-appellee
|
|
101 F.3d 92
|
Nov 22, 1996
|
Ninth
|
96 Cal. Daily Op. Ser v. 8483, 96 Daily Journald.a.r. 14,037united States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v.
Byeong Chul Choi, Aka Edward H. Choi, Defendant-appellant
|
|
101 F.3d 93
|
|
|
Guardian Life Insurance Company of America, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Estevan M. Muniz, Defendant-appellee
|
|
101 F.3d 95
|
Nov 13, 1996
|
Eleventh
|
Ellis Wayne Felker, Larry Grant Lonchar, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. Tony Turpin, Wayne Garner, John Doe,
Defendants-appellees
|
|
101 F.3d 98
|
Nov 15, 1996
|
Eleventh
|
Donald Lee Craig, Petitioner-appellant, v. Harry K. Singletary, Secretary Department of Corrections,state of
Florida, Robert A. Butterworth, Attorneygeneral, Attorney General of the Stateof Florida, Respondents-appellees
|
|
101 F.3d 100
|
Nov 18, 1996
|
Federal
|
Walter E. Durling, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Spectrum Furniture Company, Inc., Defendant-appellee
|
|
101 F.3d 106
|
Nov 20, 1996
|
First
|
Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related
Cases.united States of America, Appellee, v. Stanley Prou, Defendant, Appellant.united States of America, Appellee, v. Raheam Johnson, Defendant, Appellant
|
|
101 F.3d 106
|
Nov 18, 1996
|
First
|
Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related
Cases.amador Irizarry-sanabria, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. United States of America, Defendant, Appellee
|
|
101 F.3d 106
|
Nov 19, 1996
|
First
|
Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related
Cases.earl Braxton, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. City of Providence, et al., Defendants, Appellees
|
|
101 F.3d 106
|
Nov 13, 1996
|
First
|
Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related
Cases.juan Moises Perez-mendez, Petitioner, Appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent, Appellee
|
|
101 F.3d 106
|
Nov 14, 1996
|
First
|
Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related
Cases.chukwu E. Azubuko, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Board of Directors, British Airways, Defendant, Appellee
|
|
101 F.3d 106
|
Nov 13, 1996
|
First
|
Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related
Cases.united States, Appellee, v. Eladio Camacho, Jr., A/k/a David Richard, A/k/a Hectorperez, Defendant, Appellant
|
|
101 F.3d 106
|
Nov 14, 1996
|
First
|
Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related
Cases.united States, Appellee, v. Rony E. Orellana, Defendant, Appellant
|
|
101 F.3d 106
|
Nov 14, 1996
|
First
|
Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related
Cases.ljubica Rajkovic, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Laverde's Market, Inc., et al., Defendants, Appellees
|
|
101 F.3d 106
|
Nov 18, 1996
|
First
|
Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related
Cases.united States, Appellee, v. Antonio Cordova Gonzalez, A/k/a Poti, A/k/a El Viejo,defendant, Appellant
|
|
101 F.3d 106
|
Mar 25, 1996
|
First
|
Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related
Cases.united States, Appellee, v. Hilda Brown, Defendant, Appellant
|
|
101 F.3d 106
|
Oct 17, 1996
|
First
|
Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related
Cases.joseph G. Vecchio, Jr., Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Angelo Lamonica, Individually and As Chief of Police of Thewinthrop Police Department, Defendant, Appellee
|
|
101 F.3d 106
|
Nov 20, 1996
|
First
|
Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related
Cases.charles Langone et al., Plaintiffs, Appellees, v. William Walsh, Inc., D/b/a William Walsh Movers, Defendant,appellant.charles Langone et al., Plaintiffs, Appellees, v.
William Walsh, Inc., D/b/a William Walsh Movers, Defendant, Appellant
|
|
101 F.3d 106
|
Nov 14, 1996
|
First
|
Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related Cases.in
Re Robert J. Spenlinhauer, Debtor.robert J. Spenlihauer, Appellant, v. Spencer Press, Inc., Appellee
|
|
101 F.3d 106
|
Nov 13, 1996
|
First
|
Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related
Cases.united States of America, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. the One-sixth Share of James J. Bulger in All Present Andfuture Proceeds of Registered in the Name Ofmichael Linskey,
Defendant, Appellee.jean Holland, Claimant, Appellant
|
|
101 F.3d 106
|
Nov 15, 1996
|
First
|
Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related
Cases.federal Financial Group, Inc., Plaintiff, Appellee, v. Charles E. Serra, Jr., A/k/a Charles Serra, Jr., Defendant, Appellant
|
|
101 F.3d 107
|
Mar 04, 1996
|
Second
|
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of
the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.duquiero Higita,
Petitioner-appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-appellee
|
|
101 F.3d 107
|
Mar 07, 1996
|
Second
|
U.S. v. Williams
|
|
101 F.3d 107
|
Mar 08, 1996
|
Second
|
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of
the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.antonio Cruz,
Petitioner-appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-appellee
|
|
101 F.3d 107
|
Mar 08, 1996
|
Second
|
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of
the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.alberto Quinones,
Petitioner-appellant, v. R.j. Mcclellan, Superintendent, Respondent-appellee
|
|
101 F.3d 107
|
Mar 08, 1996
|
Second
|
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of
the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.securities and
Exchange Commission, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Drexel Burnham Lambert Incorporated; Drexel Burnham Lambertgroup Inc.; Michael R. Milken; Lowell J. Milken; Cary J.maultasch; Pamela R.
Monzert; Steven N. Posner;pennsylvania Engineering Corporation, Defendants,victor Posner, Defendant-appellant
|
|
101 F.3d 107
|
Mar 08, 1996
|
Second
|
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of
the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.jose Migel
Corona-diaz, Petitioner-appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-appellee
|
|
101 F.3d 107
|
Mar 05, 1996
|
Second
|
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of
the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.einhorn Yaffee
Prescott Architecture & Engineering, P.c.,plaintiff-appellant. v. J. Louis Turpin; Prhinebeck Architecture & Planning P.c.;john A. Missell, Defendants-appellees
|
|
101 F.3d 107
|
Mar 05, 1996
|
Second
|
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of
the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.evelyn A. Scott and
Leon Scott, Plaintiffs-appellants-cross-appellees, v. the Dime Savings Bank of New York, Fsb,defendant-appellee-cross-appellant
|
|
101 F.3d 107
|
Mar 04, 1996
|
Second
|
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of
the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.somerset Marine,
Inc., A/s/o Central National Gottesman,inc., Plaintiff-appellee, v. M/v "amer Shanti," M/v "silver Star," Their Engines, Tackle,boilers, Etc., Massan Shipping Industries
Inc.,defendants-appellants,andtrevose Shipping Co., Ltd., Defendant
|
|
101 F.3d 107
|
Mar 05, 1996
|
Second
|
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of
the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.robert Greenspan,
D.d.s., P.c., Petitioner-cross-respondent, v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-cross-petitioner
|
|
101 F.3d 107
|
Mar 08, 1996
|
Second
|
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of
the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.giovanni Rodriguez,
Petitioner-appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-appellee
|
|
101 F.3d 107
|
Mar 08, 1996
|
Second
|
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of
the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of
America, Appellee, v. Dan Austin, Defendant-appellant
|
|
101 F.3d 107
|
Mar 08, 1996
|
Second
|
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of
the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.johnny Oyola,
Petitioner-appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-appellee
|
|
101 F.3d 107
|
Mar 08, 1996
|
Second
|
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of
the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of
America, Appellee, v. Kola Noibi, Defendant-appellant
|
|
101 F.3d 107
|
Mar 08, 1996
|
Second
|
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of
the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.william Monroig,
Petitioner-appellant, v. Louis Mann, Superintendent of Shawangunk Correctionalfacility, Respondent-appellee
|
|
101 F.3d 107
|
Mar 08, 1996
|
Second
|
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of
the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.atrium Plaza Health
Care Center, Inc., Petitioner-cross-respondent, v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-petitioner
|
|
101 F.3d 107
|
Mar 08, 1996
|
Second
|
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of
the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of
America, Appellee, v. Moorthy S. Ram, Aka Srinivasan Ramamoorthy, Defendant-appellant
|
|
101 F.3d 107
|
Mar 08, 1996
|
Second
|
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of
the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of
America, Appellee, v. Thomas Vogelsang, Defendant-appellant,patricia Carson, Defendant
|
|
101 F.3d 107
|
Mar 08, 1996
|
Second
|
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of
the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.tyheem Y. Allah,
Also Known As Tyheem Mills, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Walter Fogg, Superintendent, and Herbert Mclaughlin, Deputysuperintendent, Defendants-appellees
|
|
101 F.3d 107
|
Mar 08, 1996
|
Second
|
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of
the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.lawrence P.
Strouse, Jr., Petitioner-appellant, v. Arthur A. Leonardo, Sup't., Respondent-appellee
|
|
101 F.3d 107
|
Mar 05, 1996
|
Second
|
In Re Peter Shue
|
|
101 F.3d 107
|
Mar 08, 1996
|
Second
|
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of
the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.jonathan Johnson,
Plaintiff-appellant, v. C.o. Mcalinn, C.o. Carey, and C.o. Staviski, Defendants-appellees.nurse Miles, Defendant
|
|
101 F.3d 107
|
Mar 04, 1996
|
Second
|
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of
the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of
America, Appellee, v. Juan Rosado, Aka Apache; Reynaldo Santos, Aka Juice; Juanviruet, Aka Phil, Aka Seaweb, Aka Fil; Raymond Crespo, Akatony; Josue Barreto, Aka Josh; Luis Andino,
Aka Gq, Akalou; Jamie Renae Torado, Aka Rene, Aka Van Dam; Gilbert-otorres; Jose Polanco; Alfredo San Miguel, Aka Miguel, Defendants,ignacio Morales, Aka Flaco, Melvin "heavy"
Brown, Aka Heavy;michael Arroyo, Defendants-appellants
|
|
101 F.3d 107
|
Mar 08, 1996
|
Second
|
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of
the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.maureen Cuomo, by
Her Guardian and Mother Mary Cuomo,plaintiff-appellant, v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of the Department of Health Andhuman Services, Defendant-appellee
|
|
101 F.3d 108
|
Mar 14, 1996
|
Second
|
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of
the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.anthony Bernardi,
Petitioner-appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-appellee
|
|
101 F.3d 108
|
Mar 22, 1996
|
Second
|
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of
the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.keith L. Desanto,
Petitioner, v. Securities and Exchange Commission, Respondent
|
|
101 F.3d 108
|
Mar 21, 1996
|
Second
|
U.S. v. Reyes
|
|
101 F.3d 108
|
Mar 08, 1996
|
Second
|
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of
the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.patricia Rogers,
Plaintiff-appellant, v. New York State, Disciplinary Committee, Supreme Court,appellate Division, First Judicial Department,defendant-appellee
|
|
101 F.3d 108
|
Mar 12, 1996
|
Second
|
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of
the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.victor R. Polewsky,
Plaintiff-appellant, v. Social Security Administration, Department of Health Andhuman Services, Defendant-appellee
|
|
101 F.3d 108
|
Mar 20, 1996
|
Second
|
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of
the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of
America, Appellee, v. Pedro Enrique Perez-rodriguez, Defendant-appellant
|
|
101 F.3d 108
|
Mar 22, 1996
|
Second
|
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of
the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of
America, Appellee, v. Melvin Pinckney and Fundador Cuevas, Also Known Aspowerhouse, Defendants-appellants
|
|
101 F.3d 108
|
Mar 08, 1996
|
Second
|
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of
the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.ann Mitchell-angel,
Plaintiff-appellant, v. Beth Cronin; John Toledo; Samuel Schloss; Santa Schloss;ohel Children's Home; Corporation Counsel Kendrick; Newyork City Department of Social Services; Child
Welfareadministration; Jenny Leifer; Jesus Rivera; Louis Brown,officer, Defendants-appellees
|
|
101 F.3d 108
|
Mar 08, 1996
|
Second
|
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of
the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.calvin L.
Shoemaker, Plaintiff-appellant, v. State of California; New York State; City of New York;cbs, Inc.; American Broadcasting Company, Inc. (abc);cable News Network, Inc. (cnn);
National Broadcastingcompany, Inc. (nbc), Defendants-appellees
|
|
101 F.3d 108
|
Mar 19, 1996
|
Second
|
In Re Forbes
|
|
101 F.3d 108
|
Mar 25, 1996
|
Second
|
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of
the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.fred M. Anderson,
Petitioner-appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-appellee
|
|
101 F.3d 108
|
Mar 12, 1996
|
Second
|
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of
the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of
America, Appellee, v. Luis Rodriguez, Defendant-appellant
|
|
101 F.3d 108
|
Mar 08, 1996
|
Second
|
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of
the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.francis Bove,
Plaintiff-appellee, v. Brian M. Kennedy, Trooper, As an Individual and in Hisofficial Capacity, Defendant-appellant,john And/or Jane Doe, Being and Intending to Be Policeofficer(s),
Public Servants And/or Employees Ofthe State of New York, Defendant
|
|
101 F.3d 108
|
Mar 14, 1996
|
Second
|
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of
the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.john J. Mccarthy,
Plaintiff-appellant, v. Francis Teta, Director of Classification, Defendant-appellee
|
|
101 F.3d 108
|
Mar 20, 1996
|
Second
|
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of
the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.radha R.m.
Narumanchi; Mohan L. Mehta, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. Michael J. Adanti; Frank E. Harrison, I/o; Eugene Dixon;paul Wenger; David C. Newton, I/o; Barbara Bard; Frank E.muska; Jerry
Bannister, I/o; Michael Pernal, I/o; Dorisgriscom; James Munz; Joseph Mckeon; Irene Glasser; Lewisjones; Richard Fahringer, I/o; Wafeek Abdelsayed, I/o;doris Granatowski, I/o;
Stewart Solomon, I/o; Martha F.o'hara, I/o; Connecticut State University, Board Oftrustees; Connecticut State University; American Assoc. Ofuniversity Professors; John 1-3 Dow; Jane
1-3 Dow,defendants-appellees
|
|
101 F.3d 108
|
Mar 25, 1996
|
Second
|
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of
the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of
America, Appellee, v. Richard T. Strother, Defendant-appellant
|
|
101 F.3d 108
|
Mar 08, 1996
|
Second
|
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of
the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.larriel Diggs,
Plaintiff-appellant, v. Eastman Kodak Co., Defendant-appellee
|
|
101 F.3d 108
|
Mar 08, 1996
|
Second
|
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of
the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.s.c. Fertile, Re v.
, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Ed Mcmahon and American Family Publishers, Defendants-appellees
|
|
101 F.3d 108
|
Mar 14, 1996
|
Second
|
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of
the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.hartford Hospital,
Petitioner, Cross-respondent, v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent, Cross-petitioner
|
|
101 F.3d 108
|
Mar 14, 1996
|
Second
|
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of
the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of
America, Appellee, v. Rudolph Santobello and Charles Desalvo, Also Known Ascharlie, Defendants-appellants
|
|
101 F.3d 108
|
Mar 12, 1996
|
Second
|
In Re Emily Distaj
|
|
101 F.3d 108
|
Mar 14, 1996
|
Second
|
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of
the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.sumner M. Rosen,
Plaintiff-appellant, v. Ronald A. Feldman and Columbia University, Defendants-appellees
|
|
101 F.3d 108
|
Mar 08, 1996
|
Second
|
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of
the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.eugene Celli and
Wendy Liu, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. Metro-north Commuter Railroad and Metropolitantransportation Authority, Defendants-appellees
|
|
101 F.3d 108
|
Mar 08, 1996
|
Second
|
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of
the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.john P. Bigda,
Plaintiff-counter-defendant-appellant, v. Fischbach Corporation, Defendant-counter-claimaint-appellee
|
|
101 F.3d 108
|
Mar 12, 1996
|
Second
|
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of
the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of
America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Jesus Palta, Defendant-appellant,edison A. Marolejo, Defendant
|
|
101 F.3d 108
|
Mar 12, 1996
|
Second
|
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of
the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.action Temporaries
Management Company, Inc.,plaintiff-appellee-cross-appellant, v. Stratmar Systems, Inc., Defendant-appellant-cross-appellee
|
|
101 F.3d 108
|
Mar 08, 1996
|
Second
|
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of
the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.c. Gerardo Rojas,
Plaintiff-appellant, v. Tai Shan Kang, Ye Mai Kang, and Hwa Lin Tai, Defendants-appellees
|
|
101 F.3d 108
|
Mar 12, 1996
|
Second
|
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of
the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of
America, Appellee, v. Derek Williams, Defendant-appellant
|