Case Resources
Search this Case
in
Google Scholar
on the Web
Google
Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo!
Web Search
in the News
Google
News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google
Blog Search
Technorati
Blog Search
in other Databases
Google
Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Lorna L. Mccarter, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary of the Army, Defendant-appellee
United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. - 105 F.3d 1335
Jan. 28, 1997
Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Kansas (D.C. No. 94-CV-2383).
Jeffrey L. Baxter of Chapman, Waters & Baxter, Leavenworth, KS, for plaintiff-appellant.
Jackie N. Williams, United States Attorney, and Janice Miller Karlin, Assistant United States Attorney, State of Kansas, Kansas City, KS, for defendant-appellee.
Before TACHA, BALDOCK, and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges.ORDER
BRISCOE, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Lorna McCarter appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant Togo West, Jr., Secretary of the Army, on her claims of sex-based and disability-based employment discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and § 501 of the Rehabilitation Act.
We review the district court's decision to grant summary judgment de novo. Wolf v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America, 50 F.3d 793, 796 (10th Cir.1995). After careful examination of the record, we conclude the analysis and conclusions set forth in the district court's memorandum and order granting summary judgment are correct and that plaintiff's challenge to the decision lacks merit. We therefore adopt the district court's memorandum and order, McCarter v. West, 910 F.Supp. 519 (D.Kan.1995), as the opinion of this court. See Herrera v. International Union, 73 F.3d 1056, 1057 (10th Cir.1996) (adopting district court's opinion as opinion of court of appeals).
Defendant's motion to strike portions of plaintiff's appendix is GRANTED.
The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.