Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Notice: Eighth Circuit Rule 28a(k) Governs Citation of Unpublished Opinions and Provides That They Are Not Precedent and Generally Should Not Be Cited Unless Relevant to Establishing the Doctrines of Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel, the Law of the Case, or if the Opinion Has Persuasive Value on a Material Issue and No Published Opinion Would Serve As Well.johnny Warren, Appellant, v. Mexico Chiquito, Appellee
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. - 105 F.3d 663
Submitted Dec. 24, 1996.Decided Jan. 2, 1997
Before FAGG, WOLLMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Johnny Warren appeals from the district court's1 entry of judgment for defendant after a bench trial in his employment discrimination action. In the absence of a trial transcript, we cannot review the district court's factual findings for clear error. See Meroney v. Delta Int'l Mach. Corp., 18 F.3d 1436, 1437 (8th Cir.1994). Accepting those findings as true, we agree that Warren did not establish a prima facie case of race discrimination. See Miner v. Bi-State Dev. Agency, 943 F.2d 912, 913-14 (8th Cir.1991) (plaintiff who failed to prove performance was adequate failed to establish prima facie case of race discrimination). As to Warren's allegations regarding his appointed counsel's representation below, we note that a civil litigant has no constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel. See Glick v. Henderson, 855 F.2d 536, 541 (8th Cir.1988). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas