Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related Cases.donald Gill, John Carlevale, Sr., Robert Plante, Plaintiffs,appellants, v. State of Rhode Island, et al., Defendants, Appellees.joseph Devine, et al., Plaintiffs, Appellees
United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. - 107 F.3d 1
Feb. 6, 1997
Donald Gill, John M. Carlevale and Robert F. Plante on brief pro se.
Jeffrey B. Pine, Attorney General, Thomas A. Palombo, Special Assistant Attorney General, Katherine A. Merolla and Pucci, Goldin & Merolla, Counsel to Secretary of State, on brief for appellees, State of Rhode Island, Governor Lincoln Almond, James R. Langevin, Secretary of State, and The Members of The General Assembly.
Robert E. Craven and Giannini Craven Vieira & Digianfilippo on brief for appellees, Roger Begin, Chairman of The Rhode Island State Board of Elections.
Robert D. Fine and Tillinghast Licht & Semonoff on brief for appellees, John Holmes, Chairman of The Rhode Island Republican State
Before SELYA, CYR and BOUDIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiffs, Donald Gill, John M. Carlevale Sr., and Robert F. Plante, have appealed a district court judgment declaring constitutional certain provisions of the Rhode Island election laws. Gill v. Rhode Island, 933 F.Supp. 151 (D.R.I.1996). On appeal, appellants have presented no cogent argument supported by legal authority to challenge the court's ruling and we, therefore, have no basis on which to find any error.
Affirmed.