Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related Cases.donna Guziejka, Plaintiff--appellant, v. Louis Panas, et al., Defendants--appellees
United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. - 107 F.3d 1
Jan. 13, 1997
Matthew J. Buckley for appellant.
John J. O'Brien, Jr., with whom Kirby, O'Brien & von Rosenvinge was on brief for appellee Louis Panas. Michael J. Keefe, with whom O'Malley and Harvey was on brief for appellee Town of Dracut. Thomas E. Sweeney, City Solicitor, for appellees John J. Sheehan and the City of Lowell. Regina M. Gilgun, with whom Douglas I. Louison and Merrick & Louison were on brief for appellee Susan Siopes. Joseph L. Bierwirth, Jr., Thomas M. Elcock and Morrison, Mahoney & Miller were on brief for appellees Raymond P. McKeon, Armand Caron, and the Town of Chelmsford. Joseph L. Tehan, Jr., with whom Kurt B. Fliegauf and Kopelman and Paige, P.C. were on brief for appellees Town of Groton and George (Jay) Rider.
Before TORRUELLA, Chief Judge, and COFFIN, Senior Circuit Judge, and TAURO,* District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant Donna Guziejka was laid off by the Town of Dracut Police Department, bypassed several times by other Massachusetts police departments, then rehired by the Town of Dracut. She attempted to file complaints with the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, but was told by both agencies that the limitations period had expired. Nearly two years later, she brought this action against defendants claiming that they discriminated against her in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2, and Massachusetts statutory and criminal law by failing to hire her as a police officer. The defendants moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The district court dismissed her federal and statutory claims and remanded the state common law claims to the Massachusetts Superior Court. After carefully reviewing the briefs, the complaint, and the district court order, we affirm the district court's dismissal of Guziejka's federal and state statutory claims and the remand of her state common law claims for substantially the reasons set forth by the district court in its Memorandum of Decision, dated December 8, 1995.