Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Gail Merchant Irving, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. United States of America, Defendant, Appellant.gail Merchant Irving, Plaintiff, Cross-appellant, v. United States of America, Defendant, Cross-appellee
United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. - 146 F.3d 12
June 8, 1998
Before TORRUELLA, Chief Judge, SELYA, BOUDIN, STAHL and LYNCH, Circuit Judges.
ORDER OF COURT
A majority of the judges of this court in active service have voted sua sponte to review the panel decision in this matter en banc. The panel opinions (majority and dissenting) are therefore withdrawn.
The parties shall file simultaneous supplemental briefs within thirty days of the date of this order, not to exceed twenty-five pages per side. The issues for en banc review include both the applicability of the Federal Tort Claims Act and its discretionary function exception, and the question of whether New Hampshire law (particularly that state's Good Samaritan doctrine) would hold a private actor liable under the circumstances of this case.
The en banc court reserves, pending its receipt and consideration of the supplemental briefs, any determination as to whether further oral argument will aid the decisional process. If the court answers that question affirmatively, oral argument will be scheduled during the court's September 1998 sitting. If the court answers that question negatively, the court will decide the case on the record (including the supplemental briefs).