Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Grace Tuttle, a Minor by Her Next Friend, Steven Tuttle; Rachel Sechler, a Minor by Her Next Friend, Charlotte Sechler, Plaintiffs-appellees, v. Arlington County School Board; Mary H. Hynes, Individually and in Her Official Capacity As Member, Arlington County School Board; Darlene Mickey, Individually and in Her Capacity As Member, Arlington County School Board; Elizabeth Garvey, Individually and in Her Official Capacity As Member, Arlington County School Board; Elaine Furlow, Individually and in Her Official Capacity As Member, Arlington County School Board; Frank Wilson, Individually and in His Capacity As Member, Arlington County School Board; Robert Smith, Individually and in His Capacity As Superintendent of Schools, Arlington County, Defendants-appellants,anddouglas Huff, Movant. American Association of School Administrators; Council of the Great City Schools; Magnet Schools of America; National School Boards Association; United States of America; National Association for the Advancement of Colored People; the Arlington County Chapter of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People; the League of United Latin American Citizens, Amici Curiae
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT - 189 F.3d 431 (4th Cir. 1999)
January 27, 1999, ArguedSeptember 24, 1999, Decided
NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION. SEE CORRECTED OPINION OF NOVEMBER 1, 1999, AT 195 F.3d 698.