Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Anthony L. Asciutto, Annetta Asciutto, Gaetano Bruni, Andmary E. Bruni, Petitioners-appellants, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent-appellee.carl F. Brim, Ora G. Brim, and Marshall J. Holman,petitioners-appellants, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent-appellee.cecil Z. Janolo and Marilyn A. Janolo, Petitioners-appellants, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent-appellee.stan Naisbitt, Teresa R. Naisbitt, Gerald D. Belford, Patsyj. Belford, and Kathleen M. Belford, Petitioners-appellants, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent-appellee.james M. Rau and Paula C. Rau, Petitioners-appellants, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent-appellee
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. - 26 F.3d 108
Submitted, June 7, 1994.*Decided June 17, 1994
Declan J. O'Donnell, Englewood, CO, for petitioners-appellants.
Gary R. Allen, David I. Pincus, Kevin M. Brown, Tax Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent-appellee.
Appeal from the United States Tax Court.
Before: D.W. NELSON, BEEZER and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
For the reasons expressed in Bax v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 13 F.3d 54 (2d Cir.1993), the judgment of the United States Tax Court is affirmed.
The facts in Bax differ from the facts of these cases in only one respect: here, plaintiffs Gaetano and Mary Bruni prepaid the interest with respect to one tax year. The decision in Bax, however, also provides the appropriate rationale for our holding today that, even if the Tax Court had jurisdiction, the taxpayers' claims fail on the merits. See id., 13 F.3d at 58.
AFFIRMED.