Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Sphere Drake Insurance Company, Plaintiff-appellee, v. P.b.l. Entertainment, Inc., Individually and T/a Archiesand/or P.b.l. Entertainment D/b/a Industry; 50broadway, Ltd. & Philip Basile,defendants-appellants,paul Shalsinger & Ronald Escobar, Defendants
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. - 52 F.3d 22
April 7, 1995
Before: VAN GRAAFEILAND, LEVAL, Circuit Judges, BEER, District Judge.*
PER CURIAM.
In our original decision in this matter, dated July 19, 1994, we relied upon the case of U.S. Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Val-Blue Corp., 200 A.D.2d 449, 608 N.Y.S.2d 810 (1st Dep't 1994) as the most authoritative, then-existing statement of New York law on the insurance coverage issue involved in that case and in the instant one. Plaintiff thereafter filed a motion for rehearing in this Court, which we stayed pending the results of the appeal of the First Department's decision in Val-Blue.
Because the New York Court of Appeals on February 9, 1995 reversed the Appellate Division First Department's holding, see 85 N.Y.2d 821, 623 N.Y.S.2d 834, 647 N.E.2d 1342 (1995), we must of necessity reverse our own. See Erie R.R. Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64, 58 S.Ct. 817, 82 L.Ed. 1188 (1938). Accordingly, we vacate and withdraw our July 19th decision and in place thereof, we affirm in toto the judgment of the district court under appeal.