Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Ralph J. Cataldo, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Cna Insurance Co., Defendant, Appellee
United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. - 56 F.3d 59NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states unpublished opinions may be cited only in related cases.
June 2, 1995
Ralph J. Cataldo on brief pro se.
Glenn H. Robinson, Thompson & Bowie on brief for appellee.
D.Me.
AFFIRMED.
Before TORRUELLA, Chief Judge. SELYA and STAHL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
We have read carefully the record in this case and the briefs of the parties. We have considered the various claims raised by appellant and find none to possess merit. We affirm the grant of summary judgment to appellee, essentially for the reasons given by the district court in its memorandum and order, dated January 9, 1995.
Appellant's motion to "strike or vacate court order of April 18, 1995," is denied as moot. While we agree with appellee that the statements contained in appellant's "notification of the creation of false and fictitious evidence" were completely without foundation and were not properly presented to this court, we do not deem it necessary to grant appellee's motion to strike the "notification" as the court has disregarded it in the consideration of this case. See Fine v. Paramount Pictures, Inc., 171 F.2d 571, 575 (7th Cir. 1948).
Affirmed.