Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Laurence R. and Arline P. Green, and Joseph E. and Judith T.gentle, Petitioners-appellants, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent-appellee
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. - 60 F.3d 142
Argued July 17, 1995.Decided July 21, 1995
Jonathan J. Klein, Trumbull, CT, for petitioners-appellants.
Jonathan A. Wasserman, Tax Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC (Loretta C. Argrett, Asst. Atty. Gen., Gary R. Allen and Ann B. Durney, Tax Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice, of counsel) for respondent-appellee.
Before: WINTER, CALABRESI and CABRANES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Laurence and Arline Green and Joseph and Judith Gentle appeal from decisions of the Tax Court holding that benefits they received under the Connecticut Heart and Hypertension Act, Conn.Gen.Stat.Ann. Sec. 7-433c (West 1989), are part of gross income for federal tax purposes. Benefits are paid under Section 7-433c to firefighters and police officers who suffer "either off duty or on duty any condition or impairment of health caused by hypertension or heart disease." Id. The Greens and the Gentles argue that such benefits should be exempt from taxation under applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code and regulations because the Connecticut act is "a statute in the nature of a workmen's compensation act which provides compensation to employees for personal injuries or sickness incurred in the course of employment." 26 C.F.R. Sec. 1.104-1(b).
However, a statute that provides benefits to ailing employees is not considered to be "in the nature of a workmen's compensation act" unless the benefits are paid for ailments that are work-related. As we noted in Rutter v. Commissioner, 760 F.2d 466 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 848, 106 S.Ct. 141, 88 L.Ed.2d 116 (1985), "[u]nless a statute contains some provision restricting the payment of benefits to cases of work-related disabilities, it is not in the nature of a workmen's compensation statute." Id. at 468; see also Take v. Commissioner, 804 F.2d 553 (9th Cir.1986). Because Section 7-433c provides benefits to police officers and firefighters who suffer from hypertension and heart disease whether or not those conditions are work-related, benefits paid thereunder are part of gross income.
We therefore affirm.