Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
G. David Broyles; Emily Broyles; Citizens Bank Ofmaryland, Plaintiffs-appellees, v. Roger Schlossberg, Trustee, Defendant-appellant
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. - 81 F.3d 27
Argued July 12, 1995.Decided April 1, 1996
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-93-3921-AW, BK-92-1-120-SD)
ARGUED: Roger Schlossberg, Schlossberg & Associates, Hagerstown, Maryland, for Appellant. John Sears Simcox, Simcox & Barclay, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before LUTTIG and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and NORTON, United States District Judge for the District of South Carolina, sitting by designation.
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge WILLIAMS wrote the opinion, in which Judge LUTTIG and Judge NORTON joined.
WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge:
After oral argument, we certified the following question to the Court of Appeals of Maryland:
Pursuant to Maryland Rule 2-611(d), what is the effect on the lien status of a confessed judgment when the state court "opens" the judgment for a hearing on the merits without affirmatively stating that the judgment lien is preserved[?]
Agreeing with the well-reasoned opinion of the bankruptcy court, the Court of Appeals of Maryland concluded that opening a confessed judgment does not destroy the validity of the underlying judgment lien:
We hold that opening a confessed judgment is a procedure that allows the court to consider the merits of the defendant's defense to the action without destroying the judgment's validity. The judgment, and any judgment lien derived from it, remain in effect while the court considers the merits of the defense.
....
We reject the Trustee's contention that opening a confessed judgment destroys the validity of the underlying judgment lien unless the court order contains express affirmative language preserving the judgment.
Schlossberg v. Citizens Bank of Md., 341 Md. 650, 659-60, 672 A.2d 625, 629 (1996). Because the priority status of the judgment lien is unaffected by its opening, we hold that the district court properly affirmed the bankruptcy court's lifting the automatic stay to permit the Circuit Court for Prince George's County to determine the validity and amount of the confessed judgment. The judgment of the district court, therefore, is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.