Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.patsy G. Vance, Widow of Kenneth Vance, Petitioner--appellant, v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, Unitedstates Department of Labor, Respondent--appellee
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. - 91 F.3d 136
Submitted: June 20, 1996Decided: July 9, 1996
Patsy G. Vance, Appellant Pro Se.
Christian P. Barber, Jennifer U. Toth, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp.1996). Appellant noted this appeal outside the sixty-day appeal period established by 33 U.S.C. § 921(c) (1988). A late notice of appeal precludes this court's jurisdiction to review the decision of the Board. Adkins v. Director, OWCP, 889 F.2d 1360, 1361 (4th Cir.1989). The Board entered its final order on March 13, 1995; Appellant's notice of appeal was filed on July 17, 1995. Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal deprives this court of jurisdiction to consider this case. We therefore grant the Director's motion to dismiss the appeal and suspend the briefing schedule. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED